<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Differential-expression on Chatomics</title>
    <link>https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/tags/differential-expression/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Differential-expression on Chatomics</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy; 2018 Ming &#39;Tommy&#39; Tang</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/tags/differential-expression/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>Batch Effect: To Correct or Not for Bulk RNA-seq Data</title>
      <link>https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/post/batch-effect-correct-or-not-bulk-rnaseq/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/post/batch-effect-correct-or-not-bulk-rnaseq/</guid>
      <description>A colleague sent me a PCA plot last week. Three replicates per condition, control vs KO of a gene. PC1 cleanly separated replicate 1 from replicate 2 from replicate 3. PC2 separated control vs KO. The question that followed: should we run limma::removeBatchEffect() before differential expression?
The answer is &amp;ldquo;it depends,&amp;rdquo; and most of the time the answer is &amp;ldquo;no, do not pre-correct the matrix before DE testing.&amp;rdquo; But the question hides a few subtleties worth unpacking, because I have seen people both under-correct (ignore a real block effect) and over-correct (treat true biological variation as batch and squash it).</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>