<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Bwa on Chatomics</title>
    <link>https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/tags/bwa/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Bwa on Chatomics</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy; 2018 Ming &#39;Tommy&#39; Tang</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:27:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/tags/bwa/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>bwa-mem multi-mapping reads</title>
      <link>https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/archive/bwa-mem-multi-mapping-reads/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:27:00 -0700</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/archive/bwa-mem-multi-mapping-reads/</guid>
      <description>An error I was using TEQC to do quality control of my WES bam files aligned by bwa-mem. My data are paired end, so a function reads2pairs is called to make the paired-end reads to be a single fragment. I then get this error:
&amp;gt; readpairs &amp;lt;- reads2pairs(reads) Error in reads2pairs(reads) : read pair IDs do not seem to be unique  I asked in the bioconductor support site and went to the source code of that function.</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>bwa aln or bwa mem for short reads (36bp)</title>
      <link>https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/archive/bwa-aln-or-bwa-mem-for-short-reads-36bp/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:01:00 -0700</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/archive/bwa-aln-or-bwa-mem-for-short-reads-36bp/</guid>
      <description>My ChIP-seq data are 36bp single end reads. I usually use bowtie1 for mapping ChIP-seq reads, but bowtie1 does not handle indels. Since I want to call mutations on the ChIP-seq reads, I have to use another aligner BWA, the most popular mapper written by Heng Li.
The github page says if reads &amp;lt; 70bp, bwa aln should be used. Otherwise, bwa mem should be used.
bwa mem is a more recent algorithm (should be better?</description>
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>convert bam to fastq and remap it with bwa mem</title>
      <link>https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/archive/convert-bam-to-fastq-and-remap-it-with-bwa-mem/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 15:21:00 -0700</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/archive/convert-bam-to-fastq-and-remap-it-with-bwa-mem/</guid>
      <description>Why we want to revert bam files back to fastq file? Sometimes, you get a processed bam file from other resources, but you want to map it with another aligner. For example, the old BWA aln does not keep the information for soft-cliped reads which are useful for structural variant detection, the new BWA mem is more suitable for this. So, I want to dump bam to fastq first and then realign it with BWA MEM.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>