<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Blast on Chatomics</title>
    <link>https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/tags/blast/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Blast on Chatomics</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>&amp;copy; 2018 Ming &#39;Tommy&#39; Tang</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:53:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
    
	<atom:link href="https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/tags/blast/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    
    <item>
      <title>run a local blast</title>
      <link>https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/archive/run-a-local-blast/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2014 10:53:00 -0700</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://divingintogeneticsandgenomics.com/archive/run-a-local-blast/</guid>
      <description>I was checking the quality of a ChIP-seq fastq with fastqc, and the overrepresented sequence showed that the data contain Illumina Single End Adapter 1 contamination.
I have a file which contains all the possible illumina library sequences in fasta format (got from here), and I manually looked it and found that the single End Adapter 1 sequence did not match the report. I then was wondering which sequence is the contamination.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>